Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33384 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77448 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Nov 2007 06:31:27 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77432 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2007 06:31:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 06:31:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:49050] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/10-10842-EB376474 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:31:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.34] (ppp91-77-47-108.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [91.77.47.108]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FF164018B; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:31:23 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <474673BB.2040106@daylessday.org> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:31:23 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lester CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <474670EF.3030903@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Cleanup and maintenance of internal C code From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 23.11.2007 09:25, Andy Lester wrote: > On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > >> Take a look at 5_3 and HEAD, we've done this already a couple of >> months ago: >> http://news.php.net/php.cvs/46317 > > > So I see. That's a good sign. There's still plenty of other places > to hit, too. Are we interested in jacking up compiler warning levels, > too? I was surprised to see that GCC doesn't default to running with - > Wall in the Makefile. It does if you use --enable-debug. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal