Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33299 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70319 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Nov 2007 09:52:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70303 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 09:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2007 09:52:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain avalon.aut.bme.hu from 80.77.113.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.77.113.10 jasmin.hu NetCache 5.3-5.5 Received: from [80.77.113.10] ([80.77.113.10:56227] helo=mail.jasmin.hu) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 03/98-31009-4EC51474 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:52:44 -0500 Received: from [80.77.114.13] (unknown [80.77.114.13]) by mail.jasmin.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C329811F8472 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:51:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47415CCF.5060800@avalon.aut.bme.hu> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:52:15 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <474021AD.3020902@avalon.aut.bme.hu> <1195392958.4012.15.camel@johannes.nop> <47409635.9040304@digitalsandwich.com> <47412B11.6030804@zend.com> <474144B3.3040700@avalon.aut.bme.hu> <47415443.4070203@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <47415443.4070203@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] late static binding php6 From: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu (Hodicska Gergely) > What's confusing in reading the manual about what self:: and parent:: > mean? Unless by "confusing" you don't mean what all other people mean > but "it works certain way, and I know it well, but since I want it to > work other way I'd pretend I don't understand". That would be really > confusing. You could be ironic (in my view it is not a good argument), but please check the code which I sent. Or maybe better if you check the last two examples here: http://blog.felho.hu/what-is-new-in-php-53-part-2-late-static-binding.html. I think the *behavior* of the two code blocks is confusing. And I *understand* that it can be stated in the manual that it works in this way, but *maybe* not this is the best solution. Best Regards, Felhő