Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33293 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32025 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Nov 2007 08:09:34 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32010 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 08:09:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2007 08:09:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain avalon.aut.bme.hu from 84.2.42.7 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.2.42.7 mail02d.mail.t-online.hu Received: from [84.2.42.7] ([84.2.42.7:51847] helo=mail02d.mail.t-online.hu) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CD/82-31009-CB441474 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:09:32 -0500 Received: from gergely-hodicskas-computer.local (dsl51B68E90.pool.t-online.hu [81.182.142.144]) by mail02d.mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34785BB1F for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:09:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <474144B3.3040700@avalon.aut.bme.hu> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:09:23 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <474021AD.3020902@avalon.aut.bme.hu> <1195392958.4012.15.camel@johannes.nop> <47409635.9040304@digitalsandwich.com> <47412B11.6030804@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <47412B11.6030804@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] late static binding php6 From: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu (Gergely Hodicska) > Actually, I don't think it was. If you want objects, why not use the > real thing? Just consider that ZF's initial concept was for ActiveRecord a code which needs LSB. > "more complex" is not always better. Did you find my code example "too" complex? I think if LSB is added to PHP there will be a natural need for this functionality, and a lot of user will be confused with the result. Best Regards, Felhő