Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32797 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97449 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Oct 2007 00:49:26 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97434 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2007 00:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2007 00:49:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=wmoran@potentialtech.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=wmoran@potentialtech.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain potentialtech.com designates 66.167.251.6 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: wmoran@potentialtech.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.167.251.6 internet.potentialtech.com Received: from [66.167.251.6] ([66.167.251.6:65190] helo=mail.potentialtech.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0C/64-59062-59A04174 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:49:26 -0400 Received: from working (c-71-60-127-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.127.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A69EBC3B; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:49:22 -0400 To: Antony Dovgal Cc: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20071015204922.ddc7ae0c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4713C1E6.5060505@daylessday.org> References: <20071015140534.e44b8be8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4713B5D3.9000207@daylessday.org> <20071015151617.0706a365.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4713C1E6.5060505@daylessday.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] My musings on problems I've had with the PHP community From: wmoran@potentialtech.com (Bill Moran) Antony Dovgal wrote: > > On 15.10.2007 23:16, Bill Moran wrote: > > But you're confirming something I theorized ... there _is_ something wrong > > with the PHP community. If contributors like yourself have become so > > frustrated with the users that they don't want to be involved, there is > > a REAL problem. > > You misunderstood what I said. > I'm still involved and I'm not going to leave the development. Fair enough. > But I do not respond to the reports that are not directly related to the extensions > I maintain. Well, I still consider this a problem. While your clarification is necessary, I don't feel it alters my statement. > And one of the reasons is users like you. I've been mulling over how to respond to this statement for a while. Please, for my own edification, describe who you think I am. I'm absolutely certain you're mistaken, please read below. > > I expect that this sort of frustration on the part of developers leads to > > exacerbated frustration on the part of the users, which leads to more > > frustration on the part of developers ... and so on and so on in an > > endless loop. > > So you decided to help us with that and wrote a nice blog post telling how > evil PHP developers made you to wait for two weeks, right? > > > So, I'm not sure I have any suggestions. Looks like PHP is a tough project > > to be a part of. > > Well, I do have one. Please do something more useful. Thanks. I'm unsure where all your hatred stems from. I'm trying to help get a bug in PHP fixed and I'm having difficulty with it. As a result, I'm not trying to address the difficulty directly. I can only assume that you're having a rough day, or that you've dealt with so many jerks lately that your frame of mind is that everyone who criticizes is a jerk. There is, however, such a thing as constructive criticism, and that is what I am trying to do. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com