Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32785 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89259 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Oct 2007 18:18:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89243 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 18:18:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 18:18:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=parasane@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=parasane@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.231 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: parasane@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.231 nz-out-0506.google.com Received: from [64.233.162.231] ([64.233.162.231:33023] helo=nz-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DE/52-39149-01FA3174 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:18:56 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so1078407nzc for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:18:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/QuofRwmDBp1ZtPe2woR1RceENle/FtGpRoaGJC9OXQ=; b=LkgWCh5HpLdyGxH28RYARERv3Jy/z/8CNNkZUCBzB8QOZRc1f0PwfoWd2/4AZi4HxeuvEQfkM8YBG/SJ7Tp6xVTV73+KoLa1fK9U5DypYk3zF1XZi9R8S4eUc8XWctDyjfCMKJokZ3qGkbFUBcVxuf2bN7zkIyVdc4x1wGTDhfQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=amWlQNzLgYTLJw5x7dkhlhLuPn9poORlQTOkwv85FhbNNH6LPuAuPwCYWLJVVYG3RU+iGLyuSzsXCT1I7es5t4esGLaTA6xRib0iq0Lq6H04TpZuxewXSfTKJsh2ltEg+8JMFYmPhV5KpeuvPNT6SQ/fNIi40HUi6mXZ0PnED+U= Received: by 10.141.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr2845280rvj.1192472333454; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.173.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:18:53 -0400 To: "Bill Moran" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20071015140534.e44b8be8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071015140534.e44b8be8.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] My musings on problems I've had with the PHP community From: parasane@gmail.com ("Daniel Brown") On 10/15/07, Bill Moran wrote: > > http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/48 > > Hope that article doesn't come across as too harsh, but I really feel > like it needed to be said. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > Bill, Since your blog post didn't allow comments, I'm submitting the original message thread in question right here: > On Thu, May 3, 2007 6:59 am, Crayon wrote: >> On Thursday 03 May 2007 03:18, Richard Lynch wrote: >>> On Wed, May 2, 2007 1:14 pm, Bill Moran wrote: >>> > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39062 >> >>> This discussion may be better placed on "Internals" where the people >>> who make these decisions hang out more... >> >> Maybe Bill wanted us lowly users to know that the all powerful >> developers >> aren't listening to their users. > > :-) > Some of them are definitely listening here. > And all of them are trying to juggle needs/demands/desires of an > enormous community with more variety than, errr, dog species? > Lord knows I'm not real happy with some of the decisions/directions, > but you know what? Anybody *really* unhappy that cares enough can get > off their butt and start submitting patches, and push things a > different direction. Self included, mind you. :-) It seems to me that Lynch was actually just saying, "you seem as though you have the technical know-how, so jump in feet-first and let's get going!" It wasn't "ripping [you] a new one", as you suggested in your post, unless your "old one" was that defective in the first place and was inadvertently replaced by the "new one". ;-P Before you make a public post demeaning the community that drives the project you are using, no doubt, to help put food on your table, why not take a moment to read this fantastic Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm -- Daniel P. Brown [office] (570-) 587-7080 Ext. 272 [mobile] (570-) 766-8107 Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Then you'll find out he was allergic and is hospitalized. See? No good deed goes unpunished....