Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32683 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90458 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Oct 2007 20:16:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90443 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2007 20:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Oct 2007 20:16:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:51640] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/10-26050-93DE7074 for ; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:16:58 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (ppp85-140-254-73.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.140.254.73]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D796F640183; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 00:16:53 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4707ED46.6040206@daylessday.org> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 00:17:10 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zakhlestin CC: Larry Garfield , internals@lists.php.net References: <200710042005.30734.larry@garfieldtech.com> <285930281.20071006200938@marcus-boerger.de> <200710061338.47307.larry@garfieldtech.com> <4707D8AA.9060905@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] substr/array_slice in [] From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 06.10.2007 23:57, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > I hardly find it too cryptic (it makes some array algorythms much more > readable, actually) Good for you. > and in this case, having such construction would allow us to implement > array_slice() in userland (which is not true other way round) ;) I don't get your problem, sorry. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal