Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32525 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53066 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Oct 2007 21:31:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53049 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2007 21:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2007 21:31:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([127.0.0.1:18748]) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ECSTREAM id 11/75-20520-52761074 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:31:17 -0400 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=email@fuer-et.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=email@fuer-et.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fuer-et.de from 62.75.137.136 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: email@fuer-et.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.75.137.136 fuer-et.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [62.75.137.136] ([62.75.137.136:38708] helo=eve.fuer-et.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 74/55-15406-19741074 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:16:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.156] (pD9E3F0C2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.227.240.194]) by eve.fuer-et.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D396E2A70018; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4701478F.3070802@fuer-et.de> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:16:31 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans , internals@lists.php.net References: <1191237850.2903.19.camel@johannes.nop> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEB9528E@us-ex1.zend.net> In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEB9528E@us-ex1.zend.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] T_IMPORT vs. T_USE From: email@fuer-et.de (Stefan Walk) Andi Gutmans schrieb: > Our preference would be to stick to "import" because I think the perception many will have of "use" is that it also includes files (just based on some other languages). That said I agree that compatibility would be an issue here. In fact it's even somewhat of an issue with "namespace" which is probably also used quite a bit esp. in relation to XML. You mean like "import" includes files in python? ;) Regards, Stefan