Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32491 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54136 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Sep 2007 11:26:43 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54121 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2007 11:26:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Sep 2007 11:26:43 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.123.98.46 unknown Received: from [80.123.98.46] ([80.123.98.46:16789] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 76/04-13331-2F4ECF64 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:26:43 -0400 Message-ID: <76.04.13331.2F4ECF64@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:26:08 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <725ADA22-20E9-467E-BEA7-9B59D93D33E6@prohost.org> <46FAF763.8090406@zend.com> <1190879439.3312.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46FB9702.1000206@pooteeweet.org> <00ad01c80120$ddc11920$e6dfc350@foxbox> <45F9799F-1319-48C5-A0D9-97F1C50EC0D2@prohost.org> In-Reply-To: <45F9799F-1319-48C5-A0D9-97F1C50EC0D2@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 80.123.98.46 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP_5_3 Branched From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > I am a biased party here, so take this with a grain of salt ;-) > > First of all, I definitely think we need 2 release masters, for 5.X tree > given that there will be two active branches, at least for the next few > months, there is simply too much work for one person to do. My > suggestion was going to be (Lukas beat me to the punch with his > proposal) that I RM 5.3 release and ask someone new to take over the 5.2 > branch and within 1-2 releases of 5.3.0 have that person take over 5.3 > branch, once they are a bit more familiar with the process. I do agree > that having more people try their hand at being RM is a very good idea > and historically every minor/major release had a new RM. I like that idea, too... but I don't think that Johannes would have big problems starting with 5.3.0. Anyway, I'd like to see Johannes as RM for 5.3--now or a bit later. -- Michael