Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32474 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74729 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Sep 2007 18:30:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74713 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2007 18:30:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Sep 2007 18:30:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:48508] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E7/86-31655-9C6FBF64 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:30:47 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (ppp83-237-2-174.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [83.237.2.174]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB1F640171; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:29:59 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <46FBF6A8.9050804@daylessday.org> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:30:00 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: Steph Fox , Lukas Kahwe Smith , jani.taskinen@iki.fi, Stanislav Malyshev , PHP Developers Mailing List , Pierre References: <725ADA22-20E9-467E-BEA7-9B59D93D33E6@prohost.org> <46FAF763.8090406@zend.com> <1190879439.3312.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46FB9702.1000206@pooteeweet.org> <00ad01c80120$ddc11920$e6dfc350@foxbox> <45F9799F-1319-48C5-A0D9-97F1C50EC0D2@prohost.org> In-Reply-To: <45F9799F-1319-48C5-A0D9-97F1C50EC0D2@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP_5_3 Branched From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 27.09.2007 22:06, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > I am a biased party here, so take this with a grain of salt ;-) > > First of all, I definitely think we need 2 release masters, for 5.X > tree given that there will be two active branches, at least for the > next few months, there is simply too much work for one person to do. > My suggestion was going to be (Lukas beat me to the punch with his > proposal) that I RM 5.3 release and ask someone new to take over the > 5.2 branch and within 1-2 releases of 5.3.0 have that person take > over 5.3 branch, once they are a bit more familiar with the process. > I do agree that having more people try their hand at being RM is a > very good idea and historically every minor/major release had a new RM. Sounds like a plan to me. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal