Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32350 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91904 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Sep 2007 05:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91889 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2007 05:51:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Sep 2007 05:51:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.124 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.124 c2bthomr06.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.124] ([213.123.20.124:12989] helo=c2bthomr06.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F5/42-10426-3F51EE64 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:51:48 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by c2bthomr06.btconnect.com with ESMTP id ANX17456; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:51:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <46EE1685.1060300@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:54:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070716 SeaMonkey/1.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <1F69D3A2-0020-4B78-8B78-F4EE483ECC5D@prohost.org> <46EC6830.5060603@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary) From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >>> For the most part it seems that there is a general consensus on the >>> features to go into PHP 5.3, my suggestion is that all features with >>> >10 points are to be put into the 5.3 TODO and the rest can have >>> another change for PHP 6 and/or PHP 5.4 (if that comes to pass). >>> Either way, there definitely appears to be a set a solid reasons to >>> start the 5.3 branch. >> >> Will there be also 5.2.5? From the feature set looks like 5.3 is going >> to take some time and in the meantime we have bugfixes, etc. - so it >> makes sense to me. > > The "agenda" for 5.3 looks to be fairly busy, and I don't think we can > wait 6-7 months between releases, so 5.2.X branch will need to be > maintained while 5.3 is being made ready for production. Does that statement imply that PHP6 is at least another 12 months away :( Does all this effort simply push the adoption of PHP6 as the main branch further back. ( And I'd still like to know what use the code for mysqlind is for those of us who will never enable mysql ? ) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://home.lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk MEDW - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/ Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php