Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32338 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53428 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Sep 2007 16:47:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53413 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2007 16:47:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2007 16:47:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:49963] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 85/E1-42628-33E5DE64 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:47:49 -0400 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (4-182.63-81.stat.fixnetdata.ch [81.63.182.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235E71B3652; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:47:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:47:43 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <191696442.20070916184743@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Steph Fox" CC: "Ilia Alshanetsky" , "Lukas Kahwe Smith" , "Stanislav Malyshev" , "PHP Developers Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <012701c7f87c$59a3ab00$4501a8c0@foxbox> References: <1F69D3A2-0020-4B78-8B78-F4EE483ECC5D@prohost.org> <46EC6830.5060603@zend.com> <46ED4585.3070608@pooteeweet.org> <012701c7f87c$59a3ab00$4501a8c0@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary) From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Steph, speakin as a looser - we should keep what we just decided on and do it. Do it as in work on it. As in code. As in no more politics for the moment. marcus Sunday, September 16, 2007, 6:12:14 PM, you wrote: > Hi Ilia, > If it helps any we can count everything else in and just look at the ones > that failed: > No quorum: > ====================== > Switch for disabling/enabling materialized cursors in mysqli - 25/28 no > vote, 3 positive votes > Merge the GCC 4 -fvisibility patch - 20/28 no vote, 7 positive votes, 1 > negative vote > Voting anomalies: > ================ > Introduce concept of "strict classes" that do not permit dynamic property > creation - 12/28 no vote, 12 positive, 4 negative > Implement David's Circular Garbage collection patch - 13/28 no vote, 11 > positive, 4 negative > Link phar extension from PECL into core - 12/28 no vote, 11 positive, 5 > negative > Definitely out: > ============== > Remove safe_mode, register_globals and magic_quotes - 6/28 no vote, 4 > positive, 18 negative > I think it's probably fair to say that the mysqli-specific issue shouldn't > be on this agenda in the first place, and the GCC 4 patch most likely failed > because those that aren't directly affected by it don't understand it enough > to vote over it. > That leaves just three features that fail under your voting system but might > pass under others. The question is whether those three are up for debate > now, or later. > - Steph > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" > To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" > Cc: "Stanislav Malyshev" ; "PHP Developers Mailing List" > > Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 4:31 PM > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List (Summary) >> >> On 16-Sep-07, at 11:02 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> >>> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >>>> On 15-Sep-07, at 7:18 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >>> >>>> NP ;-) Btw the detailed breakdown of the votes is available here >>>> http://bb.prohost.org/53Features.pdf >>> >>> I have taken the data from this PDF and slightly reworked things [1] so >>> that its easy to see which topics got more attention with votes than >>> others. I think its critical to understand that several items were hard >>> for the general community to vote on because of lack of expertise (as >>> noted in several votes). As such I find it questionable to apply a +10 >>> threshold on all items. >>> >>> Furthermore I ask everybody to review if his vote was interpreted as >>> they wanted in Ilia's PDF. Some people made their votes conditional, >>> which is not supported by the formats chosen for tallying up the votes. >> >> Lukas has a good point about the "0" votes, however if there are niche >> features most people don't really care/know about that in itself means >> that there is not much support for said functionality. IMHO the point of >> the vote was to identify KEY features general community (developers & >> users) would like to see in 5.3, not to introduce feature creep, which >> re-enumeration of the vote does to some extent, please keep that mind >> when reviewing the #s. Additionally, remember that 5.3 is a "minor" >> release and is not the most appropriate platform for "anything & >> everything" inclusion. >> >> Ilia Alshanetsky >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> Best regards, Marcus