Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32246 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88124 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Sep 2007 12:39:13 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88109 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2007 12:39:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Sep 2007 12:39:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=buildsmart@daleenterprise.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=buildsmart@daleenterprise.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain daleenterprise.com from 67.78.11.229 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: buildsmart@daleenterprise.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.78.11.229 daleenterprise.com Received: from [67.78.11.229] ([67.78.11.229:58700] helo=daleenterprise.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D0/73-02197-07C86E64 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:39:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daleenterprise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E898245D2F; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:39:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daleenterprise.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daleenterprise.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28503-14; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:39:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.1.100.11] (relay.mustangrestomods.com [67.78.11.226]) by daleenterprise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB025245D25; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:38:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <639782303.20070911114250@marcus-boerger.de> References: <6F509818-65A2-4B17-8C44-6970E815A169@prohost.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2AE39@us-ex1.zend.net> <46E5B223.5070406@chiaraquartet.net> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2AE65@us-ex1.zend.net> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2AF4D@us-ex1.zend.net> <46E622F6.5000208@chiaraquartet.net> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2AF58@us-ex1.zend.net> <639782303.20070911114250@marcus-boerger.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: <65B25E48-CB2F-44E2-BB08-6D3C82E9FC53@daleenterprise.com> Cc: "Andi Gutmans" , "Gregory Beaver" , "David Coallier" , "PHP Developers Mailing List" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:38:56 -0400 To: Marcus Boerger X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) MTA-Interface: amavisd-new-2.3.3 (2005-08-22) + Maia Mailguard 1.1.0 at daleenterprise.com X-Spam-Scanned: using SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) at daleenterprise.com X-Virus-Scanned: using ClamAV 0.88.6 (2006-11-05) at daleenterprise.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Why not jar for phar? (was Re: [PHP-DEV] PHAR was PHP 5.3 Suggested Feature List) From: buildsmart@daleenterprise.com (BuildSmart) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 11, 2007, at 05:42:50, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Andi, > > to end this 'many tools' reasoning. For those issues we already > adopted > zip and if people insist I wouldn't mind if anybody would provide a > working > tar implementation that allows reading of tgz and tar.bz2 files as > well. > Yest the purpose of Phar is very different. Anyway can it be that > Dmitry was > using an old version of Phar where indeed the performance was bad? While this may seem trivial to some, is there a reason that spl is disabled when phar is enabled? > > marcus - -- Dale -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG5oxg0hzWbkf0eKgRAq03AKDOy7h6XGSg9nZ4C5ZdCCkmu+0dyACdH8VB 4aUIE+OBi0ArJG5W+mYxf2U= =tWzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----