Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:32119
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <46E2E74E.3010604@daylessday.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:17:50 +0400
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
CC:  internals@lists.php.net
References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2ABE1@us-ex1.zend.net> <46E2CE70.4040907@daylessday.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2ABE5@us-ex1.zend.net>
In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CEA2ABE5@us-ex1.zend.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: FW: [PHP-DEV] Patch for macros for tracking refcount and is_ref
From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal)

On 08.09.2007 21:31, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Uhm I didn't mean to make this about one company or another (it was just an example, 
> and btw, I think they've contributed to APC :) and this discussion is going very much 
> of track. I guess you either didn't understand what I was saying or don't realize 
> that this is not necessarily going to be applicable to everyone (although it may 
> depending on how it performs; and I hope it is applicable to everyone). 

Well, it was difficult to understand it wrong: you said that it's a major change and
it should be tested well (I completely agree with that).

But I don't see why we should especially care of a particular company which MIGHT be affected by this patch.
Either they care about it and help us with to make it better, or we do & test it as good as _we_ can.

> I'm also just
> saying that it may need some time to mature like many patches which are so deep.

Sure, that's obvious.

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal