Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97458 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Aug 2007 17:57:26 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97443 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2007 17:57:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2007 17:57:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.182 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.182] ([209.85.146.182:26101] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E9/72-14462-683B5D64 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:57:26 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so286898waf for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:57:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AnCp59Lhm4BVRxA+NKE/O/JKH6j0H+Jrne3cqkqkQGJPFoFqwKfIUgt76wR6jpky1CIwYxETO+jP2cuw+xsbCXJx4VRlwCwQZCKm+Ox5iSWZY0ZhBELiC/o5OgqlB163kpzhoTHUabjAQHTm/xBFWiM/3trNFl+U5w+EX1VHGxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WlX7yupVaP5UXWoZvXPWwh1XDX2bkl7HsWOwZHCiLFDMLynbSZSkaHFH9yen6h8aSDYrI45nItGPdhgNFBdsNV2jh4ujcCXlIjt27yNUMKnJAFNxSmBkI2e2qCLW3NWXQsr5I83JOBF16AY4e6f81VBj3vc6bERYAzGDfUs50sc= Received: by 10.115.55.1 with SMTP id h1mr69773wak.1188410239276; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:57:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.180.9 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:57:14 +0200 To: "Stanislav Malyshev" Cc: "Sebastian Bergmann" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <46D5AB26.8000805@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46D299AE.6000404@pooteeweet.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AAC79@us-ex1.zend.net> <7d5a202f0708281446m56086ef5vd2c3710cd0f564f3@mail.gmail.com> <1188377895.3311.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AB03F@us-ex1.zend.net> <46D5AB26.8000805@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On 8/29/07, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > Then we should make sure that the garbage collector goes into HEAD ASAP, > > should we not? > > Does anybody uses HEAD in production on a bunch of moderate-to-heavily > loaded sites? If not, how does it matter if the patch sits in HEAD or > not, one that wishes to test it can do that. > > I'm not against GC (unless it's slow :) but I don't see why putting it > into HEAD matters so much. HEAD is for _development. If we loose the development branch, I cannot imagine any sane to get things done, to get things in nice way :) --Pierre