Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31968 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83074 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Aug 2007 17:21:48 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83059 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2007 17:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2007 17:21:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:4135] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3F/50-14462-92BA5D64 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:21:48 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.16.180]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:21:43 -0700 Message-ID: <46D5AB26.8000805@zend.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:21:42 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Bergmann CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <46D299AE.6000404@pooteeweet.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AAC79@us-ex1.zend.net> <7d5a202f0708281446m56086ef5vd2c3710cd0f564f3@mail.gmail.com> <1188377895.3311.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AB03F@us-ex1.zend.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2007 17:21:43.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[11C6B170:01C7EA61] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > Then we should make sure that the garbage collector goes into HEAD ASAP, > should we not? Does anybody uses HEAD in production on a bunch of moderate-to-heavily loaded sites? If not, how does it matter if the patch sits in HEAD or not, one that wishes to test it can do that. I'm not against GC (unless it's slow :) but I don't see why putting it into HEAD matters so much. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com