Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31964 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28331 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Aug 2007 15:19:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28316 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2007 15:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Aug 2007 15:19:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:41422] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 29/F1-17634-57E85D64 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:19:17 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 08:19:14 -0700 Message-ID: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AB052@us-ex1.zend.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? Thread-Index: AcfqTlgFnB+uMfyoR+Ob3hxiEA37rgAALS7Q References: <46D299AE.6000404@pooteeweet.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AAC79@us-ex1.zend.net> <7d5a202f0708281446m56086ef5vd2c3710cd0f564f3@mail.gmail.com> <1188377895.3311.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE9AB03F@us-ex1.zend.net> To: "Sebastian Bergmann" , Cc: "David Wang" Subject: RE: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? From: andi@zend.com ("Andi Gutmans") Sebastian, Just so you guys don't get the wrong idea, I have a garbage collector book sitting on my shelf which I bought 2-3 years ago as I was thinking of implementing this. Unfortunately I hit some issues and edge cases and didn't have enough time to spend on this. So I'm definitely not against a garbage collector. It's something I think would be very good for PHP even if it were optional. I do think though that we need an opportunity to review it, test it & benchmark it. Again, whoever has done work in his life on memory managers knows how sensitive they are.=20 David, do you have a patch against PHP 5.2? For some reason I don't think I got the updated patch although Derick said you sent it out. Thanks, Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Bergmann > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:06 AM > To: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What should be in 5.3? >=20 > Andi Gutmans schrieb: > > This is based on our experience with making changes in the memory > > manager (significantly smaller changes than this one) and how long it > > takes to stabilize them. >=20 > Then we should make sure that the garbage collector goes into HEAD > ASAP, > should we not? >=20 > -- > Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian- > bergmann.de/ > GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B > 5D69 >=20 > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php