Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31767 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60358 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Aug 2007 05:53:23 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60343 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2007 05:53:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2007 05:53:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:14497] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/C2-36574-3DD7AC64 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:53:23 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:53:19 -0700 Message-ID: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE92D7D8@us-ex1.zend.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6? Thread-Index: Acfjb3reKW/VlT+NQ36fLV+9ux8JwwAR55bw References: <1181829227.3478.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <468E2F78.9090002@pooteeweet.org> <10845a340707060509u70152abctf1801324be490ed1@mail.gmail.com> <468E400E.6060005@e-novative.de> <46C9EDE0.6050505@sci.fi> <46C9F186.6040501@zend.com> <46C9F425.2040104@sci.fi> <46C9FCE4.1030000@zend.com> To: Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6? From: andi@zend.com ("Andi Gutmans") Before we continue this discussion I think there are a couple of things which would be useful data points: a) What is the performance difference between an implicit Unicode app and non-Unicode. If we have 3-4 apps ported over to = Unicode_semantics=3Don with only true binary strings cast to binay and real strings as UTF-16, then I volunteer to put it through our performance lab and come up with some real numbers. The lab is very well setup and is quite accurate. Do we have volunteers to port some of those apps? I suggested some apps a few emails ago. b) We should try and figure out whether a script could automatically migrate an application. I'll look into this but if anyone has time to work on something like that it'd be very helpful input. I think if we get more clarity on these two then it'll go a long way in making this discussion more productive... Andi