Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31712 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93271 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Aug 2007 19:00:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93256 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2007 19:00:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2007 19:00:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.188 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.188 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.188] ([209.85.198.188:53718] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/D0-21447-F20F5C64 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:59:59 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so553295rvb for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:59:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Gula6uji8j5k+9Blur/nhnQxJnduIG8oxw6VLW4aALeWQBeVuwFlNRkm8klt/gFllf95uaQuDn6d6KBNfHfRzZwqkEHMKI4SesolggKNGmG2BamqwSpnh2LW09uzImsvYs0N3lCoC4afvHIGQRSVJZ2bY5kTmTKJv+w9YaVUb+A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zx2PcF90DxEsW2j19zcjtpO2tcW5IEZaz2hUoPn00vY8oWm53YuxOIfsVlQgr3F29YkLsh8s+Oug1lX7XltyQnFuJdfLPJZQ3m2bLZ+JNlwz2Jw0oXwAj+zXgJ39A5wHEk1y1OxIuSC1VdHZHVcwT2Fg4IEKYQ0OWp3v0Bm4Wpg= Received: by 10.115.76.1 with SMTP id d1mr3573161wal.1187377195764; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.47.2 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:59:55 +0200 To: "Stanislav Malyshev" Cc: "PHP Developers Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <46C5E17A.6000008@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3B3E836C-A029-4877-97EB-D935E5853C9A@wanderingknights.org> <46C33F52.6040202@oracle.com> <46C4A085.3070604@zend.com> <46C4DCB0.4080509@zend.com> <46C5E17A.6000008@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Nowdocs revised From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On 8/17/07, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > True, but the result is the same. The new functions/classes can't be > > used (only some rare additions can be efficiently emulated in user > > land). > > Yes, but you still have option of working around it. Right now we don't > have an option to work around new syntax. I hate to rain on your parade, > because I think this functionality is good and would have a lot of good > uses, but I'm worried about creating code that runs in one 5.x and can't > be even compiled by another. There can be a lot of problems with > external tools, too. I agree about codes not running in the same "bug fixes" branch. However I don't see a problem to introduce this patch in 5.3.0 (think about "b" introduced in 5.2.x). --Pierre