Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31666
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 37797 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Aug 2007 05:32:29 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 37782 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2007 05:32:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 17 Aug 2007 05:32:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.181 wa-out-1112.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.146.181] ([209.85.146.181:19598] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A3/C0-31045-CE235C64 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:32:28 -0400
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so113690wag
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=WeKbo7s/duWkw/2q/UzK7Ij4TVYdALxhuvdFNmYzaxCE9ctmygb28FtqrgmiXBT5Jmyl9/o7l1ttAW7Xb5ot/0cxSdkiQZWf0fg6802hy81SKDsnI2Rx2bL71mho6jpR92sD17/Ikiv2+cIIt6R80gjpZjZqLXPe8eiGkcWw1/U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Md7T51/PCB0NEiHIt5x7hVcERk6229ntCTMSARnR96PFEHz09GoMKnRe9w2FxLTsgLz9n8va/fj2I0liizpl1+amuV+WiF0LHUuXnhmWUabk6Opq6IB9OP+a68w2eNcWKdH1p2IMVmoBuviZlUfFBtYgTZv0MP0w2tii+N4NJaY=
Received: by 10.114.192.1 with SMTP id p1mr2769705waf.1187328729254;
        Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.47.2 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fe05d1540708162232i6d6fb01fsb87cd6d7a52fba9a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:32:09 +0200
To: "Stanislav Malyshev" <stas@zend.com>
Cc: "PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <46C4DCB0.4080509@zend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3B3E836C-A029-4877-97EB-D935E5853C9A@wanderingknights.org>
	 <46C33F52.6040202@oracle.com>
	 <A58F9CDC-ACFB-4703-8813-339C3824659F@wanderingknights.org>
	 <46C4A085.3070604@zend.com>
	 <fe05d1540708161403r5ec3acfeq66adedcf2965a6dd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46C4DCB0.4080509@zend.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Nowdocs revised
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre)

On 8/17/07, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote:
> > I don't see a difference between a "fatal error call to undefined
> > function" and or a parse error. It can go without problem in 5.3.
>
> Ah, there is a difference - you can do function_exists to check for a
> function, but you can do nothing if your file doesn't parse.

True, but the result is the same. The new functions/classes can't be
used (only some rare additions can be efficiently emulated in user
land).

> > <<< was never obvious, there is no obvious string to use in this case
> > (not obvious for everyone and his mother).
>
> Perl does <<FOO and <<'FOO' and I think in this case difference is more
> clear. I'm not sure this is the way, but it can be an option. Everybody
> is welcome to propose - maybe it will be as much fun as the namespace
> separator thread ;)

In this case, it will be yet another "Mark all as read" thread :-)

Cheers,
--Pierre