Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31641 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34247 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2007 19:07:53 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34232 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2007 19:07:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2007 19:07:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:61944] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 64/40-31284-980A4C64 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:07:53 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.16.180]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:07:50 -0700 Message-ID: <46C4A085.3070604@zend.com> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:07:49 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gwynne Raskind CC: Christopher Jones , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <3B3E836C-A029-4877-97EB-D935E5853C9A@wanderingknights.org> <46C33F52.6040202@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2007 19:07:50.0604 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD8970C0:01C7E038] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Nowdocs revised From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > I didn't get any further, no :(. The decision of whether to merge the > nowdocs patch is out of my hands now, since I don't have source karma. > However, since the main thing standing in the way of its implementation > was concern over the usefulness, your comment is very helpful, and I'd > like to open the topic for discussion again on the list, if no one out > there has any objection :) I think we can have it in HEAD and maybe in 5.3 - though it raises questions about compatibility (code not parsing in certain PHP versions and parsing in others might be a problem). Not sure if <<<~ is the best syntax - it's definitely not obvious, maybe we could think of something better. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com