Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31601 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37026 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Aug 2007 21:53:24 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37011 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2007 21:53:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Aug 2007 21:53:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tijnema@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tijnema@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.188 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tijnema@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.188 fk-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.188] ([209.85.128.188:7434] helo=fk-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/63-16161-1D573C64 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:23 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f33so44507fkf for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MRpuduToRp8dvWLewTRxd1dclYS6Sx9STEjfCTEwLGxjDr3MAG8xc2PSALIDBHpLu1+A1SAlGINrVA2TMT/59nIfXclz9leyVknWcEtRlxtF8v5W89Qw2x+Q8FTsIB3eXcevg0rmKpHWOIyQ2JFfDCJ2nQ+6N5XByzXVCyHPYZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FmBQMI7GUgGtomNbvBty99GwerPUfkI1qwF5kFTvF34aNGDjgpLOzmWhwNZXOvDA2fAXswISwSLsAdg/waPDBvqX6tBK9kWgnGkrZGYjQT1oguLdckUYL2h7bwP2tVcVGfTFBZ3g9+lVN9xSOD0rLXmmRuOXM479Q2BhffKFOSE= Received: by 10.82.174.20 with SMTP id w20mr1611037bue.1187214797961; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.141.17 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:53:17 +0200 To: "Guilherme Blanco" Cc: "Stanislav Malyshev" , "Ralph Schindler" , "PHP Internals" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46BE14B1.5050209@zend.com> <46C337F4.5080001@zend.com> <46C340D1.3070700@zend.com> <46C346D1.7090203@smashlabs.com> <46C34E11.1020109@zend.com> <46C36D90.9030507@zend.com> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PHP-DEV] Renaming namespaces to packages] From: tijnema@gmail.com (Tijnema) On 8/15/07, Guilherme Blanco wrote: > On 8/15/07, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > > Take a look at this URL and tell me which one PHP does look like: > > > http://kaistizen.net/Project/CSharpJava/csharp_java.htm#NamespaceVsPackage > > > > Neither, actually. But it's not about "should we imitate C# or Java". > > It's about what's best for PHP. My opinion is that for PHP would be best > > to have namespaces and not packages. > > > > > From Portuguese Brazilian Wikipedia: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Package > > > Translated to you.... > > > > In English, it says: > > A software package is a bundle of one or several files that either are > > necessary for the execution of a computer program, or add features for a > > program already installed on the computer or network of computers. > > > > A software package is that beautiful box you go to the supermarket and > buy the product. A package in programming language is exactly what I > wrote to you. > > > > All you told until now in favor of namespaces are marketing related. > > > Just read your previous messages. > > > > OK, let's see - what is "marketing"? If it's "a set of efforts aimed at > > promoting better understanding and wider usage of PHP language" than I > > don't see how it can be bad and how it is not important to consider. > > > > If it's "an evil conspiracy of suit-wearing aliens to subvert PHP > > community to serve their evil alien purposes" then I know nothing about > > it but it definitely doesn't have anything to do with what I do. > > No. You mentioned not only once that namespace are better for users to > understand than packages. > > Seems you are the only one until now that still want to keep "namespace". > But I already have a solution to it.... I already mentioned on IRC. > > Instead of namespace or package, you can go to something like > zendspace or stanspace > +1 zendspace Tijnema -- Vote for PHP Color Coding in Gmail! -> http://gpcc.tijnema.info