Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31444 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38118 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Aug 2007 18:09:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38086 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 18:09:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 18:09:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:3640] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A8/A0-31594-E5F63B64 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:09:37 -0400 Received: (qmail 4907 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 18:02:49 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 18:02:49 -0000 Message-ID: <46B36DC8.3080101@zend.com> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:02:48 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lester Caine CC: PHP internals References: <87E4F8AF-06DE-4FCC-AD1B-83E932A5E180@prohost.org> <46B2DDDB.6020801@lsces.co.uk> <46B2E196.4080400@zend.com> <46B2FF97.3080302@lsces.co.uk> <46B3049E.5080309@zend.com> <46B3328F.8000809@lsces.co.uk> <46B333CA.3060902@zend.com> <46B369A5.3070902@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <46B369A5.3070902@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.2.4RC1 Released From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 03.08.2007 21:45, Lester Caine wrote: >> It should be already there, please check it out. > > OK - Thanks Antony - that is looking fine. I'm happier now to move it to a > production machine and see what the results are with a bit of load. Does this mean you've tested it and it works fine now? -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal