Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31406 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81050 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Aug 2007 10:34:29 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81005 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 10:34:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 10:34:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:7371] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 25/00-13770-2A403B64 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:34:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 23417 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 10:34:07 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 10:34:07 -0000 Message-ID: <46B3049E.5080309@zend.com> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:34:06 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lester Caine CC: PHP internals References: <87E4F8AF-06DE-4FCC-AD1B-83E932A5E180@prohost.org> <46B2DDDB.6020801@lsces.co.uk> <46B2E196.4080400@zend.com> <46B2FF97.3080302@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <46B2FF97.3080302@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.2.4RC1 Released From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 03.08.2007 14:12, Lester Caine wrote: >> Blindly reverting something is no fix, those changes were done for a >> good reason, even though Marcus didn't test them very good (but that's >> what RCs are for, isn't it?). > > Obviously they were not tested at all? I don't know of any people using Interbase except for you and Ard (who maintains all interbase extensions). So even if somebody did run the tests against an RC, he/she didn't tell a word to us. > There may be some subtle reason why this has been changed and OUR current fix > is to load a copy of the 5.2.1 version which fixes the bug - so until someone > explains why it was changed then reverting works fine. > > I had to give up switching to 5.2 as I did not have the time to fix all the > problems that it was throwing up. What kind of problems? > Then it should be possible for someone who HAS commit rights to actually make > it work? Yes, if only this somebody has Windows build env, Interbase and will to help us. Unfortunately we don't have such people in PHP community. Edin and Pierre are two people doing windows builds, but none of them use Interbase as far as I know. I must also note that you don't have to have commit rights to cook a patch and send it to the list. > Currently the php_interbase driver is almost unusable in PHP5.2 as > shipped, but the 5.2.1 copy works fine. Try the very next snapshot, I applied a patch after a discussion with Marcus. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal