Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31373 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72245 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Aug 2007 11:33:28 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72229 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2007 11:33:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Aug 2007 11:33:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:45518] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 40/00-06390-AE0C1B64 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:33:03 -0400 Received: from dhcp-172-30-11-223.zrh.corp.google.com (unknown [216.239.55.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79451B3524; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:32:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:32:53 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1621200185.20070802133253@marcus-boerger.de> To: Sebastian Bergmann CC: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <46AE49B3.2070100@php.net> <1185883035.23889.31.camel@johannes.nop> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE7C10BB@us-ex1.zend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fix inconsistencies in OO calls From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Sebastian, yep, you and Derick are right here. This is definitively a fix that should go in. Chinstrap just commit the stuff please. marcus Thursday, August 2, 2007, 11:36:54 AM, you wrote: > Derick Rethans schrieb: >> I think that'd be a bad idea. I don't see a problem with this patch at >> all, and why should people use reflection here? As you're always so much >> for BC, I find it strange that you're suggesting to remove something >> totally harmless and instead want people to force to use the >> slow Reflection API which is meant for introspection. > I agree. The Reflection API is the "right tool for the job" when you > are meta-programming (developing tools such as PHPUnit, for instance) > but not when you are programming. > -- > Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ > GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69 Best regards, Marcus