Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31348 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70677 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Aug 2007 08:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70655 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 08:47:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 08:47:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.186 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.186 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.186] ([209.85.198.186:40345] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 25/72-39533-4F240B64 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:23:18 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g11so106274rvb for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:23:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W7GX8XM3u2yb6uiZALT47B4/tKG2m/5X+kmOAPi5FR5iU3wwAHjB4bbYEUf7y11MVCbka8/0/Kib1TQ8/IcioUm3eO9/Pa2aYZ7oCu+PlOsUWksNNeVX3rgUGZJk9CzlnWZQmYIL/MYr+paTURb3DRHxFOjGiKAzv+3e7TAId+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ckjsDGspQaRWRXoVNnyr88N1YOMEcVhrujM/jOdEpEK8qwOyyDa8DlPRb/qsUk92qW0I4s+Np2rG/s4Il2Jbnkg/P6l3UKFC5Yryy/kn4CJpOCFAONk/I9Jcc74xBaUStTn368Tywz2daPFWL6PlCwDaQ2KP7lbQf2T0NPpJjgg= Received: by 10.115.47.1 with SMTP id z1mr456455waj.1185956593331; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.47.2 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:23:12 +0200 To: "Daniel Stenberg" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46AF6536.4010600@lerdorf.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding the ext/curl extension From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hi Daniel, On 7/31/07, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > > Daniel, I don't really understand what renaming the extension would > > accomplish. > > Then I didn't make myself clear. > > The point of renaming would be to allow people to search for something with a > name that doesn't confuse them. If the binding would be called 'mombamoolo', > they would search for that and they would certainly not be confused by > products or projects called curl or libcurl (even if they would know that > mombamoolo uses libcurl). > > Now they search for curl and libcurl instead, and they read the docs on our > site, and yes some of them get angry or even hostile on us when they can't > find enough details about PHP on our curl site. I would like to suggest you a few things I did for libgd. It has the same problem (even worst, as PHP forked gd a few years back). - Add abinding entry in the navigation menu in all your pages (not only for libcurl) - Add a notice (in bold, italic and red :) on the homepages (curl and libcurl) that you have nothing to do with the binding and put a link to the binding page (which should only have a "see myfavouritescriptinglanguage.net/curl" for further details) - Drop the PHP doc on your site as soon as you consider the PHP manual as good enough But pushing the PHP docs (as Steph suggested later) to your site will only bring you more questions about php's CURL binding. It sounds like a bad idea :) Cheers --Pierre