Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31241 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54787 invoked by uid 1010); 24 Jul 2007 17:54:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54769 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2007 17:54:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jul 2007 17:54:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:61898] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A6/B4-14257-BCC36A64 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:54:20 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.16.180]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:54:16 -0700 Message-ID: <46A63CC1.5060503@zend.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:54:09 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ceo@l-i-e.com CC: Tim Starling , internals@lists.php.net References: <46A4CCA5.9080608@wikimedia.org> <50461.209.254.223.2.1185246930.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <50461.209.254.223.2.1185246930.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2007 17:54:17.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[A75394E0:01C7CE1B] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] "No Feedback" in bug tracker From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) >> A suggestion: allow anyone to reopen bugs marked "no feedback". Also >> allow anyone to switch a bug from "feedback" to "open". > > I believe this idea has a great deal of merit, unless it has proven to > be subject to abuse in the past or something. I agree with "no feedback", but not necessarily with "feedback" to "open" since it might lead to a mess in case when we really need to track if feedback was already sent. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com