Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31202
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=trTC9o2j/Ax8ASQU96ginzot7TBOs91fssiOb/J7rqar1A+Q/ScMpfxk1ZL1ufx4Z1b6Gd7K24d2NKCyobOpTrjbPRptl+TueaKl3r3o+tJuqbNaFYuu6CDCtJeeUgKXSw2o52v07ebmjCf0UCWwYT/3FmYFTMhTAvA8nciAK2M=
Message-ID: <30bd80240707230902m5084b6d9te4489173675f22ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:02:43 -0400
Sender: nicobn@gmail.com
To: "Derick Rethans" <derick@php.net>
Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=" <dz@bitxtender.com>, 
	"PHP Internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.98.0707231646120.27483@kossu.ez.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_153327_19538827.1185206563287"
References: <46A31D95.2080407@fischer.name>
	 <E996AAF4A714DF4D9BD59E9418957A2128CD19@peak8sbs.peak8solutions.local>
	 <46A4661A.6080202@zend.com> <200707231140.55535.pstradomski@gmail.com>
	 <46A4BA4F.6090506@dealnews.com>
	 <40CA6572-030F-43E2-8706-64D1167C527C@bitxtender.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.0.98.0707231646120.27483@kossu.ez.no>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Question about Namespace patch
From: nicobn@php.net ("=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nicolas_B=E9rard-Nault?=")

------=_Part_153327_19538827.1185206563287
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Despite all the comments made on this list by countless people, it's still
Stanislav's way or the highway. I don't want to sound negative but come
on... this is getting ridiculous. Stanislav, why don't you just tell
everybody that you'll stop answering because the patch will stay AS IT IS
over your dead body anyway ? I think you'll save us all some time.

This discussion is endless and not productive. I can't speak for anybody
here but I think a vote by all people who have commit access to php-src
would clarify this issue once and for all so we can just move along.

But that's just my 2 cents.

On 7/23/07, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, David Z=FClke wrote:
>
> > Am 23.07.2007 um 16:25 schrieb Brian Moon:
> >
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::Column
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::Table
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::Join
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::ForeignKey
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::Session
> > > > import SQLAlchemy::Transaction
> > >
> > > Why use namespaces if you are going to do this?  You are just bringin=
g
> your
> > > classes into the global name space.  The nice thing about namespaces
> IMO, is
> > > that I don't have to have a class named SQLAlchemy_Transaction.  I ca=
n
> just
> > > have a class named Transaction in the SQLAlchemy namespace.  I can
> then
> > > create a new object using $obj =3D new SQLAlchemy::Transaction.
> >
> > Oh yes, sure, that must be the main point about namespaces - I can use
> "::"
> > instead of "_" as a delimiter! Yay!
>
> You forgot that you can also move the "prefix" in front of the class
> name to "namespace prefix!"
>
> > Come on, you can't be serious.
>
> I sort of agree, I don't see how the current implementation is really
> useful for anything.
>
> regards,
> Derick
> --
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>



--=20
Nicolas B=E9rard-Nault (nicobn@gmail.com)
=C9tudiant D.E.C. Sciences, Lettres & Arts
C=E9gep de Sherbrooke

Homepage: http://nicobn.googlepages.com

------=_Part_153327_19538827.1185206563287--