Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31103 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24064 invoked by uid 1010); 19 Jul 2007 14:02:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24049 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2007 14:02:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jul 2007 14:02:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:50589] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 22/08-02284-AEE6F964 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:02:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 1354 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2007 14:02:14 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 19 Jul 2007 14:02:14 -0000 Message-ID: <469F6EE1.7080104@zend.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:02:09 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keryx Web CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <469E59FA.6060104@keryx.se> <0E62C134-68DF-4240-81BB-3A3EEA0E293D@prohost.org> <469F6A09.2050909@keryx.se> In-Reply-To: <469F6A09.2050909@keryx.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] libc and random functions From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 19.07.2007 17:41, Keryx Web wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> Do you have a patch? > > Also @Antony Dovgal in the "let blocks" thread > > Short answer: No. > > The reason I posted my suggestions on this list was that a while ago I > had a few ideas as to how PHP could be improved. What I don't understand about the crypt thing you propose - is what problem are you trying to fix this way? If there are no problems, then please don't improve anything not broken. "No reasons to keep it" is wrong, there is at least one reason to keep it as is - it works fine. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal