Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:31037 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7409 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Jul 2007 08:20:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7394 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2007 08:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2007 08:20:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.5 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:54996] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5B/92-18661-E5DCD964 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 04:20:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6I8KaEB006668; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:20:36 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:20:36 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Zeev Suraski cc: Pierre , Andi Gutmans , Lukas Kahwe Smith , Ilia Alshanetsky , jani.taskinen@iki.fi, PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20070718023255.0dc0eed0@zend.com> Message-ID: References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE648191@us-ex1.zend.net> <54C4340A-D9EA-4B5A-B39C-B55B29B1B3BC@prohost.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE648193@us-ex1.zend.net> <469B7FB1.1070507@pooteeweet.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE648290@us-ex1.zend.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20070718023255.0dc0eed0@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] POSIX regex From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 00:21 17/07/2007, Pierre wrote: > > > > On 7/16/07, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > I disagree with this view of the world. > > > > Well, we seem to all agree on this view, but let forget this > > unsignificant fact :) > > I wanted to send my 2c even though I'm not really involved in internals@ any > longer - because in reality it doesn't really have much to do with such > decisions. internals@ makes decisions that effect the entire PHP userbase. > > We all need to remember that the people on this mailing list are not close to > something that represents the userbase. We do have some very opinionated > people on this list, some of them with a lot of commit-karma - which are not > very open to feedback from regular users. This sounds like a broken record, this sounds like a broken record, this sounds like a broken record. I've heard this so many times now, it get's boring. You seem to think that none of the people on the internals list are part of the user base - that is incorrect. Most of my opinions come forth out of my involvement with an extremely large code base. > I'm not saying I represent the PHP userbase, and I don't think Andi is > saying this either - but both of us try to take the end user's view > when we think about stuff like this, as opposed as the internals@ PHP > developer view. I would go as far as saying that I think we do it (as > well as some others, like Rasmus) more so than some others on this > list. Regarding the unicode on/off modes, I don't think you put yourself in the developer's view at all. Users are not going to be better of having to deal with both modes. > For that reason I suspect that if you moved the discussion to, say, > php-general - you'd see a much more balanced view of the world. I really doubt that, as that list does not include many people that use PHP for internal projects. It's mostly the "geeks" that have time to discuss on the list. I know that *many* PHP users don't either know about this list, or simply can't be bothered with it. > As for ereg - especially in light of the discontinuation of PHP 4 we > shouldn't even consider removing it in PHP 5. I don't think anybody wanted to remove it in PHP 5 - just make it possible to disable as an extension. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org