Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30973 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61240 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Jul 2007 13:53:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61225 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2007 13:53:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jul 2007 13:53:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:62106] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A6/03-43463-F387B964 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:53:04 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:53:00 -0700 Message-ID: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE648193@us-ex1.zend.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] POSIX regex Thread-Index: AcfHsAmSTrYeNrlaS1Grz7ZQgPjS6AAAFP4A References: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE648191@us-ex1.zend.net> <54C4340A-D9EA-4B5A-B39C-B55B29B1B3BC@prohost.org> To: "Ilia Alshanetsky" Cc: , Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] POSIX regex From: andi@zend.com ("Andi Gutmans") Even in PHP 6 I am not sure it's a good idea. There are a huge amount of apps that use them and it'll be very hard for people to upgrade. Anyway, let's do some more research on that once we get closer to PHP 6 and see what the migration path looks like. We'll have to check with a few popular apps + google code search :) No need to decide on that right now without having more info. Andi=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:ilia@prohost.org]=20 > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:48 AM > To: Andi Gutmans > Cc: jani.taskinen@iki.fi; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] POSIX regex >=20 >=20 > On 16-Jul-07, at 9:46 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote: >=20 > > Why move it to PECL? I agree that PCRE is the preferred way but not=20 > > having ereg() will break a huge amount of applications for=20 > very little=20 > > gain. >=20 > I tend to agree, unless we provide wrappers via PCRE that=20 > emulate ereg functionality I don't think we can remove posix=20 > regex until PHP 6. >=20 > Ilia Alshanetsky >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20