Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30901 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67829 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Jul 2007 06:31:43 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67814 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2007 06:31:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jul 2007 06:31:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 213.46.255.22 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.46.255.22 viefep18-int.chello.at Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [213.46.255.22] ([213.46.255.22:38528] helo=viefep32-int.chello.at) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/5C-11631-ACD68964 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:31:40 -0400 Received: from genuine.home ([213.47.89.232]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20070714063025.YQKB28517.viefep32-int.chello.at@genuine.home>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:30:25 +0200 Received: from chello213047089232.17.14.vie.surfer.at ([213.47.89.232] helo=[192.168.1.51]) by genuine.home with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1I9b5j-0008U0-S3; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:26:58 +0200 Message-ID: <46986D7F.4020509@fischer.name> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:30:23 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Stogov CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <000501c7c247$56a551d0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <000501c7c247$56a551d0$6e02a8c0@thinkpad> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=C2272BD0; url=http://markus.fischer.name/my_public_key.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -45 X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "genuine.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as only being a general lurker on this list, I remmeber when Namespaces came up the first time, there were some technical problems (or just syntactical sugar ones?) with the "::" operator also being used as a namespace separate additional being a class separator. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [213.47.89.232 listed in combined.njabl.org] 1.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FW: Simple Namespace Proposal From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as only being a general lurker on this list, I remmeber when Namespaces came up the first time, there were some technical problems (or just syntactical sugar ones?) with the "::" operator also being used as a namespace separate additional being a class separator. How has this been handled or are there some caveats to watch for? thank you, - - Markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGmG1/1nS0RcInK9ARAlMBAJ9ixpfVZ4GZQF8u0Lgd+HJall9pLgCgo9gA ogZkPQ+mgJcDxESEYGizkYs= =9OAV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----