Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30846 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66313 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Jul 2007 09:50:26 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66297 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2007 09:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jul 2007 09:50:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.5 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:35063] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/97-09861-F59F5964 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:50:25 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6C9oBrM019002; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:50:11 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:50:12 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Tijnema cc: ceo@l-i-e.com, jani.taskinen@iki.fi, PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <469562DD.2030601@sci.fi> <2067.24.1.37.132.1184199932.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Apache handler with Multiple PHP versions From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tijnema wrote: > On 7/12/07, Richard Lynch wrote: > > > Other problems: > > > > Getting 2 PHP modules to co-exist without tromping on each others' > > symbols is, I think, the show-stopper... > > Both modules are different files, and only one will be dynamically > loaded by dlopen(), that works fine right? or do I forget something? You forget that the symbol names in both shared objects are still the same. If you have that you get *major* issues when running the code. So no, it does not work fine. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org