Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30576 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23104 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jul 2007 22:59:04 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23089 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 22:59:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 22:59:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sfl@scotfl.ca; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sfl@scotfl.ca; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain scotfl.ca does not designate 8.12.32.82 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sfl@scotfl.ca X-Host-Fingerprint: 8.12.32.82 smtp1.joyent.net Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [8.12.32.82] ([8.12.32.82:61543] helo=smtp1.joyent.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 28/EA-09628-739CE864 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:59:04 -0400 Received: from [70.64.19.111] (bigip_float [10.12.32.12]) by smtp1.joyent.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4D4C26E; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:59:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: <9CF26B80-08EE-437E-BC15-E5286671C1A2@scotfl.ca> Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:58:57 -0600 To: Derick Rethans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RIP PHP 4? From: sfl@scotfl.ca (scott lewis) On 6 Jul 2007, at 0832, Derick Rethans wrote: > Ladies, Gentlemen, Kings and Princesses, > > With the nice PHP 5 / PHP 6 unicode semantics thread under way I am > trying to gauge what people feel about dropping support for PHP 4 > at the > end of this year. That does not mean that we will not fix security > issues, we have to as the install base is too large, but that would be > the only thing that would warrant a new release. I already sort of > mentioned this on april 1st, but I think we should come with a > slightly > more official statement. Your votes please (only -1 and +1 are > allowed)! +1