Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30522 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85307 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jul 2007 15:05:04 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85292 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 15:05:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 15:05:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.243.58.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.243.58.163 mail4.netbeat.de Received: from [83.243.58.163] ([83.243.58.163:46495] helo=mail4.netbeat.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D1/52-50692-E1A5E864 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 11:05:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 24313 invoked by uid 507); 6 Jul 2007 15:04:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.102?) (postmaster%schlueters.de@82.135.84.224) by mail4.netbeat.de with ESMTPA; 6 Jul 2007 15:04:59 -0000 To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:04:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1183734252.23632.15.camel@johannes.nop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 (2.10.2-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RIP PHP 4? From: johannes@php.net (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) +1 On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:32 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: > Ladies, Gentlemen, Kings and Princesses, > > With the nice PHP 5 / PHP 6 unicode semantics thread under way I am > trying to gauge what people feel about dropping support for PHP 4 at the > end of this year. That does not mean that we will not fix security > issues, we have to as the install base is too large, but that would be > the only thing that would warrant a new release. I already sort of > mentioned this on april 1st, but I think we should come with a slightly > more official statement. Your votes please (only -1 and +1 are > allowed)! > > regards, > Derick >