Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30504 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99774 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jul 2007 13:31:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99759 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 13:31:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 13:31:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mls@pooteeweet.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mls@pooteeweet.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pooteeweet.org from 212.112.227.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mls@pooteeweet.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.112.227.169] ([212.112.227.169:60885] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 40/F5-50692-3344E864 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:31:33 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4443DDF00C6; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:31:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24427-02; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:31:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [77.74.0.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E7BDF0106; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 15:31:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <468E442D.4050309@pooteeweet.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:31:25 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi Cc: Antony Dovgal , internals@lists.php.net References: <1181829227.3478.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4678252F.2050803@sci.fi> <46783212.4020900@lerdorf.com> <34654.216.230.84.67.1183064088.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <54557.78.61.224.253.1183098089.squirrel@avilys.eik.lt> <4684BB91.4070507@zend.com> <2169.24.1.37.132.1183693664.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <1183699755.14343.5.camel@johannes.nop> <7d5a202f0707060224oa64dfeaw2c7ee17a735648f9@mail.gmail.com> <468E1158.2030900@lerdorf.com> <468E13C6.1070109@pooteeweet.org> <468E2009.9000703@zend.com> <468E4312.3010701@sci.fi> In-Reply-To: <468E4312.3010701@sci.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6? From: mls@pooteeweet.org (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Jani Taskinen wrote: > Antony Dovgal kirjoitti: >> On 06.07.2007 14:04, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >>> To me it boils down how we want to maintain the "fork": >>> >>> 1) PHP5 and PHP6 >>> 2) PHP6 unicode off/on (with PHP5 in maintenance mode) >>> >>> Considering that people will not jump on PHP6 immediately anyways, I >>> think 1) is more realistic, if we make best efforts to back port new >>> features to PHP5, but still require that new features go into PHP6 >>> first. Some features might not get back ported and that is a somewhat >>> unfriendly nudge towards PHP6. So it goes. >> >> I tend to agree with this POV more and more. > > Well, that's what I've tried to say for a long time. We're forking > whether we want it or not. So why not make it official? I'd rather > maintain 2 branches than 2 "versions" in same branch. And 2 set of > tests..and and.. Yup, I did not get what you mean when you said it first, but now I get it :) regards, Lukas