Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30503 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97234 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jul 2007 13:26:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97219 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 13:26:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 13:26:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain sci.fi from 63.208.196.171 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jani.taskinen@sci.fi X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.208.196.171 outbound.mailhop.org FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Received: from [63.208.196.171] ([63.208.196.171:2866] helo=outbound.mailhop.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 36/A5-50692-B034E864 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:26:36 -0400 Received: from dsl-vsabrasgw1-fe68fb00-185.dhcp.inet.fi ([84.251.104.185] helo=[192.168.0.100]) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I6npQ-00096K-Fl; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:26:32 -0400 X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19zuGfzx3ayhtkxabiaII0dQ4Zjtlth/p0= X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 84.251.104.185 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18aMhLGMI09+eXrVXS0wltU3f2NvxjDAZY= Message-ID: <468E4312.3010701@sci.fi> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:26:42 +0300 Reply-To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antony Dovgal CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <1181829227.3478.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4678252F.2050803@sci.fi> <46783212.4020900@lerdorf.com> <34654.216.230.84.67.1183064088.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <54557.78.61.224.253.1183098089.squirrel@avilys.eik.lt> <4684BB91.4070507@zend.com> <2169.24.1.37.132.1183693664.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <1183699755.14343.5.camel@johannes.nop> <7d5a202f0707060224oa64dfeaw2c7ee17a735648f9@mail.gmail.com> <468E1158.2030900@lerdorf.com> <468E13C6.1070109@pooteeweet.org> <468E2009.9000703@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <468E2009.9000703@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6? From: jani.taskinen@sci.fi (Jani Taskinen) Antony Dovgal kirjoitti: > On 06.07.2007 14:04, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> To me it boils down how we want to maintain the "fork": >> >> 1) PHP5 and PHP6 >> 2) PHP6 unicode off/on (with PHP5 in maintenance mode) >> >> Considering that people will not jump on PHP6 immediately anyways, I >> think 1) is more realistic, if we make best efforts to back port new >> features to PHP5, but still require that new features go into PHP6 >> first. Some features might not get back ported and that is a somewhat >> unfriendly nudge towards PHP6. So it goes. > > I tend to agree with this POV more and more. Well, that's what I've tried to say for a long time. We're forking whether we want it or not. So why not make it official? I'd rather maintain 2 branches than 2 "versions" in same branch. And 2 set of tests..and and.. --Jani