Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30473 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50928 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jul 2007 00:32:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50913 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 00:32:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2007 00:32:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=wrowe@rowe-clan.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=wrowe@rowe-clan.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rowe-clan.net from 64.202.165.182 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: wrowe@rowe-clan.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.202.165.182 smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.202.165.182] ([64.202.165.182:54498] helo=smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 20/56-01463-E8D8D864 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:32:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 18268 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2007 00:32:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2007 00:32:10 -0000 Message-ID: <468D8D89.7090309@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:32:09 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Oliver Block , internals@lists.php.net References: <468D6C57.9030405@block-online.org> <468D7022.6010109@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <468D7022.6010109@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] TSRMG From: wrowe@rowe-clan.net ("William A. Rowe, Jr.") Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> something isn't clear to me: Is php as apache module supposed to work >> without problems - if compiled as zts - only on apache worker or even >> on apache prefork? > > I think if you manage to compile it that way it might work, but I don't > really see why you would want to do it - TS build is slower. If you want a module loadable under either prefork, or worker, or even perhaps the newer event mpm; you must build zts. Since many OS bundles support multiple MPM's - they are going to build zts. And you are right - wins you nothing (loses you a bit in performance) to run the prefork MPM with zts.