Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30463 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96030 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Jul 2007 16:05:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96013 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2007 16:05:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jul 2007 16:05:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:46003] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/DC-00649-0E61D864 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:05:54 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.16.180]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:05:49 -0700 Message-ID: <468D16DB.6010501@zend.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:05:47 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Bibbs CC: PHP internals References: <737242.30279.qm@web704.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <737242.30279.qm@web704.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2007 16:05:49.0777 (UTC) FILETIME=[5ADDFC10:01C7BF1E] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Simple Namespace Proposal From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > As a PHP user also frustrated with lack and namespaces and having > lurked here for a while I know there was a prior proposal and many > countless, lengthy discussions on separators and all. Have the prior > proposals been invalidated? I think most prior proposals tried to do too much and got into various complications because of that. As for separators, I still didn't see any idea that made departing from established :: worthwhile. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com