Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30223
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=FU36l8Qt9iIp1i62pj6cnDZa8BWbmSNg0bn8ZulCwa2wDMw3ynIowiVaq4UyJtST8u+8p4FD41Y/sYbNnAf1jixCy5iDqEfQPVJD98x9wujjA37BcJkspLX3h6XMYeYIQxO0S232XkjeQkmU4ve4e/AC+C6Lgdnm2lt6Pn+DVFg=
Message-ID: <10845a340706180400he0e9348hd09beeea6294cd64@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:00:02 +0100
Reply-To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <00d301c7b197$895cb200$bdb9614d@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <10845a340705290705u377dbd5csc42100875e7aa036@mail.gmail.com>
	 <10845a340706180353v1e59be43p4d1bf33c0647c29e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <00d301c7b197$895cb200$bdb9614d@foxbox>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win
From: rquadling@googlemail.com ("Richard Quadling")

Sorry. Not complaining, just looking for clarification.

On 18/06/07, Steph Fox <steph@zend.com> wrote:
> We all know it's problematic already. Everyone's looking for solutions
> rather than complaints here :)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Quadling" <rquadling@googlemail.com>
> To: "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:53 AM
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: SNAPS+SNAPSPecl different to Pecl4Win
>
>
> > Anyone?
> >
> >
> >
> > On 29/05/07, Richard Quadling <rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> If you take the extensions in
> >> http://snaps.php.net/win32/php5.2-win32-200705291230.zip (has 45
> >> extensions) and in
> >> http://snaps.php.net/win32/pecl5.2-win32-200705291230.zip (has 77
> >> extensions). They are all dated the same datetime and are not
> >> duplicated, so an extension is in 1 of the archives, but not both. So,
> >> this is a combined count of 122 files - 120  DLLs and 2 JARs.
> >>
> >> Now, compare that the the PECL4Win archive
> >> (http://pecl4win.php.net/get_all.php/5_2/pecl4win_5_2.zip), there are
> >> 94 files in PECL4Win.
> >>
> >> The following are only available from the PECL4Win archive:
> >>
> >> php_filter.dll
> >> php_hash.dll
> >> php_hidef.dll
> >> php_ixsfunc.dll
> >> php_xdebug.dll
> >> php_yaz.dll
> >>
> >> If they are extensions, I assume they are not part of the normal
> >> build. If so, why are they not in the snapshots pecl archive?
> >>
> >> Is there a separation between PHP core dealing with an extension and a
> >> PECL extension?
> >>
> >> So, in using ...
> >>
> >> php -n -m
> >>
> >> I see that filter and hash are built in, so for windows, why are they
> >> available as extensions?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> And php_yaz.dll requires yaz.dll, but this is not been part of the
> >> php5.2-win32-latest.zip archive since 1st May 2007. Should this be
> >> part of the archive?
> >>
> >> --
> >> -----
> >> Richard Quadling
> >> Zend Certified Engineer :
> >> http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
> >> "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----
> > Richard Quadling
> > Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
> > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
>


-- 
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"