Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30175 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62461 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Jun 2007 14:02:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62445 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2007 14:02:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jun 2007 14:02:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.181 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.181 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.181] ([209.85.146.181:29850] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 20/69-31483-D2A41764 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:01:58 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so689637waf for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WkPkybVTEjzwj4vMPwAW6aIjDXlv802jsMgeAMcJu/kVNlRZX2xIqURk/1k016BGuW5yjwsLdtrGw17VHaz+8D+FcLHG4y/g4CUfHxUmJQaW+XCerqwSPU4xFetY3iBLx2rwW9AXOvnW4fGb9v3tBvBP1Na6qo3Ruue6JEySezo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DJPZF1v3UXAAM6DzqPl0ktWAB+vfX0Lfsd6x3qxDnLB81KceS1APZKtJ3rqtUPOkCvPzLejL2GZ9CrOwVGgGorZlGpJyWuf0iIX6mWS3KedUEhLvMPWlgF4vqwlwHpWsc/srSdZuC9QbvHqgJHQViw1gYgaiMvi2D29xrlKjqcI= Received: by 10.115.18.1 with SMTP id v1mr1928661wai.1181829657510; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.180.9 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:00:57 +0200 To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1181829227.3478.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1181829227.3478.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What is the use of "unicode.semantics" in PHP 6? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hi Jani, On 6/14/07, Jani Taskinen wrote: > During Derick's talk about PHP 6 at PHP Vikinger, I started to wonder > what exactly was the reasoning behind adding something like > "unicode.semantics" option. Derick didn't remember, neither did I. > > Apparently it's another one of these "register_globals" or > "magic_quotes_*" directives we'll remove in PHP 7? :D > > I mean, if PHP 6 is about unicode, why upgrade to PHP 6 and disable it? > Just stay with PHP 5 then.. Apparently there is a certain amount of users (undefined/undefinable masses) who like to use PHP6 new features (?) without unicode. The arguments were about the incompatibilities (the zend fatal errors are likely to cause more troubles :) and performance. I was one who likes to have a single mode: unicode. --Pierre