Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:30027 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36259 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Jun 2007 12:09:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36244 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 12:09:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 12:09:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=info@adaniels.nl; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=info@adaniels.nl; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain adaniels.nl from 82.94.236.173 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: info@adaniels.nl X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.236.173 loco.helderhosting.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.236.173] ([82.94.236.173:34909] helo=loco.helderhosting.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 77/43-03780-B5C00664 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:09:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.170] (a80-126-54-132.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.126.54.132]) by loco (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F0D51F115; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:08:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46600C59.1010406@adaniels.nl> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:08:57 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi Cc: 'PHP Internals' References: <465E00E2.4010905@zend.com> <465E08D9.4020101@sci.fi> <465E7A28.3010100@zend.com> <465E8F99.70407@sci.fi> <49250.216.230.84.67.1180642728.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <465F305A.9020902@zend.com> <465FE701.6080401@adaniels.nl> <1180695997.3481.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1180695997.3481.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020806020803040308070202" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5 or 6? From: info@adaniels.nl (Arnold Daniels) --------------020806020803040308070202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When you build the Apache2 SAPI the only binary build is the module, so '--program-suffix' is unused. Anyway it doesn't have to be the same configuration option per say (though I don't see why not), but the method of specifying the suffix with configure is much handier than having it hard-coded in source. I've stated the reasons in the previous e-mail. Best regards, Arnold Jani Taskinen wrote: > Because it's --program-suffix and not --library-suffix. > > --Jani > > On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 11:29 +0200, Arnold Daniels wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Why isn't the Apache module appended with the same suffix as the other >> binaries (configuration option --program-suffix). It seems like the >> logical solution here. That way you can have any different versions if >> you want, but the default is just the overwrite. >> >> Best regards, >> Arnold >> >> >> >> Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> >>>> I'd rather not have my old libphp#.so file over-written when I install >>>> a new version, in case things go horribly wrong and I want to just >>>> roll-back... >>>> >>> Then you have the same reason to worry right now - every php5 install >>> from 5.0.0 to 5.2.3 overwrites libphp5.so. >>> >>> >>>> There was a time where one could have 2 php mod versions running at >>>> once, as I recall, and having different filenames was kinda important, >>>> eh? >>>> >>> Well, there was a setting that kinda allowed that, but I'm not sure it >>> ever worked correctly - there are all sorts of symbol clashes, etc. >>> >>> On the other hand, you can happily run two (or a dozen :) PHP versions >>> right now - just install any FastCGI implementation, compile two >>> cgi-fcgi PHPs and install. Only thing you would need to care about is >>> to give them separate php.ini's and/or separate extension directories. >>> > > --------------020806020803040308070202--