Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29991 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28995 invoked by uid 1010); 31 May 2007 09:28:10 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28980 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 09:28:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2007 09:28:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stefan.walk@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stefan.walk@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stefan.walk@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.182 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.182] ([209.85.146.182:20760] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/F1-13361-9259E564 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 05:28:09 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so122202wag for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 02:28:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mFagPnYYm2ncqFsnCiDzrb86stQt98N3EDETHWurQFX/Q6XCVJgML8xv2V4sRdNu4KBrM409DlGGm067UFi/040W/sA/U5ni53WxGQS9kk0NMQhkjXs0pC8pbesNEdtNI0ZxHe2OgPkYVTADJ9cYLYq1ndVetM7wQ8U1lmVJgLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vn6l8G29h5/xj0WR0XZg8RknZL8DKAWdDqHPMfyc8BSbFrMG/H3Aexzmcml3eFyjFdq/mwOXYLHveFj+jxTABZB++02KgK0njVzySGBsP1RN8jQ/lVdGpjjmuYhq10X+xE+HhjskCcfjvRd0GVILMQYBlDBoaeGI6nfsW4bLAYo= Received: by 10.114.76.1 with SMTP id y1mr353944waa.1180603686796; Thu, 31 May 2007 02:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.94.7 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 02:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4858f9d90705310228l4a622d12o4e5eb634b15b293@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:28:06 +0200 To: "Antony Dovgal" Cc: jani.taskinen@iki.fi, "PHP Internals" In-Reply-To: <465E917A.5030202@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <465E00E2.4010905@zend.com> <465E08D9.4020101@sci.fi> <465E7A28.3010100@zend.com> <465E8F99.70407@sci.fi> <465E917A.5030202@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5 or 6? From: stefan.walk@gmail.com ("Stefan Walk") Correct me if I'm wrong, but for those "just not possible" cases, a single version-constant in the source would suffice, right? So it's at least not inconsistent... Regards, Stefan