Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29989 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24336 invoked by uid 1010); 31 May 2007 09:12:35 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24321 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 09:12:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2007 09:12:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:12784] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0D/51-13361-F719E564 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 05:12:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 318 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 09:12:28 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 31 May 2007 09:12:28 -0000 Message-ID: <465E917A.5030202@zend.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:12:26 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jani.taskinen@iki.fi CC: 'PHP Internals' References: <465E00E2.4010905@zend.com> <465E08D9.4020101@sci.fi> <465E7A28.3010100@zend.com> <465E8F99.70407@sci.fi> In-Reply-To: <465E8F99.70407@sci.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5 or 6? From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 31.05.2007 13:04, Jani Taskinen wrote: > Antony Dovgal kirjoitti: >> On 31.05.2007 03:29, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>> The whole idea of having that number there is pretty stupid..why not >>> just remove them altogether..? >> >> Well, in some places it's just not possible, like libphp6.so etc. > > You chose just the right example! Now, can you tell why it is necessary? > And remember, everything is possible..there is no impossible here, we're > having a totally new major version and everything. Well, you might want to have both libphp5.so and libphp6.so installed, but only one of them enabled. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal