Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29981 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92641 invoked by uid 1010); 31 May 2007 07:33:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92626 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 07:33:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2007 07:33:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:14204] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BF/80-20735-C2A7E564 for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 03:33:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 12391 invoked from network); 31 May 2007 07:32:57 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 31 May 2007 07:32:57 -0000 Message-ID: <465E7A28.3010100@zend.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:32:56 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sniper@iki.fi CC: Stanislav Malyshev , 'PHP Internals' References: <465E00E2.4010905@zend.com> <465E08D9.4020101@sci.fi> In-Reply-To: <465E08D9.4020101@sci.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5 or 6? From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 31.05.2007 03:29, Jani Taskinen wrote: > The whole idea of having that number there is pretty stupid..why not just remove > them altogether..? Well, in some places it's just not possible, like libphp6.so etc. Other places should be fixed, of course. Actually I have a patch for some SAPIs, just didn't have time to test and commit it. > Stanislav Malyshev kirjoitti: >> I notice that there are a number of places in HEAD where php 5 is still >> mentioned - some build targets, file names, etc. Is there any reason for >> it or it's just an omission and eventually only php 6 should be ever >> mentioned in this branch? > -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal