Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29952 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85835 invoked by uid 1010); 30 May 2007 13:04:09 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85820 invoked from network); 30 May 2007 13:04:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 May 2007 13:04:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=jani.taskinen@sci.fi; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain sci.fi from 63.208.196.171 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: jani.taskinen@sci.fi X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.208.196.171 outbound.mailhop.org FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Received: from [63.208.196.171] ([63.208.196.171:2649] helo=outbound.mailhop.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 30/F4-51978-6467D564 for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 09:04:08 -0400 Received: from [81.22.163.71] (helo=[10.6.109.37]) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HtNqN-0001Zo-SV; Wed, 30 May 2007 09:04:04 -0400 X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+P0y1SuI12WsrCeeUOUkUZrm2RtwWUtfg= X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 81.22.163.71 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/e2VhO8syeD/4QK84AxgcWHB8h66Q4OGQ= Reply-To: sniper@iki.fi To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: PHP Internals List In-Reply-To: <465D35D2.4050001@lerdorf.com> References: <4e89b4260705280856t47429e54ofcc182e02a6627e5@mail.gmail.com> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE3AFF97@us-ex1.zend.net> <465CFFF8.7070603@lerdorf.com> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE3AFFA2@us-ex1.zend.net> <001d01c7a27f$6d12bf80$39dc2f52@foxbox> <465D13E4.9050201@lerdorf.com> <1237063851.20070530094541@marcus-boerger.de> <465D2FB0.5060308@lerdorf.com> <014601c7a293$3e047440$39dc2f52@foxbox> <465D35D2.4050001@lerdorf.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:04:01 +0300 Message-ID: <1180530241.3496.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] better changeset tracking From: jani.taskinen@sci.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 01:29 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Well, the problem is that if the work involved to do this is in any way > CVS-specific, it will be throw-away work once we move away from CVS, > which is inevitable. What we don't know at this point is the lifespan > of CVS. I'm unmotivated to do anything with SVN with the major 1.5 You keep repeating "inevitable", but exactly what is the "inevitable" here? AFAIK, CVS works fine: don't fix if it isn't broken! I'd like to here the (real) reasons why the switch would be beneficial for project like PHP. I'm using both CVS and SVN daily, but I still prefer CVS..perhaps I'm just old-fashioned..:) --Jani