Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29868 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55925 invoked by uid 1010); 29 May 2007 15:13:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55909 invoked from network); 29 May 2007 15:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 May 2007 15:13:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.233 nz-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.162.233] ([64.233.162.233:56979] helo=nz-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9C/6A-08609-7034C564 for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 11:13:11 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so1097320nzf for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:13:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sjJMc79gXVbem9lBIUtL7sqb6CIRFbyAbHh+lJMenS0Efp70vAqfRcxUY8jywkv8SBnD+k0jb5fco2T4wy0we7C5DIghB1SC6e+ZWPHXCU1t8ZZrZEvr4peeRp5SlRc701B1Ic3Gya/IUrSazBDhG6dUT2t5t9zhpn0RyY4M+Bs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DYRph4OhhcCBtFDxjhqJf4M643DEmN3FndHt2jM/6NhUVNEMU10cJ/NmPTkFfp+Ls0/lgE8l64zvvXWOtMa9yL1Gnknx5Qganj0LVWRVNr3kValiHN/2vtvfqjPBQLf0OB0tWWvGKTC4HCUVZjfn+RQBK+3eWgOjfAM5hYdAUsU= Received: by 10.115.72.1 with SMTP id z1mr3477514wak.1180451588920; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.178.2 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:13:08 +0200 To: RQuadling@googlemail.com Cc: "Gaetano Giunta" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <10845a340705290803l6524f3edrbc676a3bf150f5c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4658DD8A.8050004@gmail.com> <10845a340705290716h33d23284j1714658e7e6d504c@mail.gmail.com> <9bf34f240705290756v59f30bb6s1a06eb591164c857@mail.gmail.com> <10845a340705290803l6524f3edrbc676a3bf150f5c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Fixing PECL + Core From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On 5/29/07, Richard Quadling wrote: > Isn't PECL4WIN "official"? It's on the php.net domain. " the official pecl package releases", you missed the word "releases" :) I do think that having DLLs based on the releases (like zip-1.8.10 for example) would be a very good thing. I'm for one not a fan of using snapshots on production servers. I may use HEAD only for the releases but it defeats the main purposes of HEAD in php-src (for the extensions being in php-src and pecl) or in general: developments. About Philip's original post, I will try to come up with a more complete reply later this week. --Pierre