Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2980 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23519 invoked by uid 1007); 29 Jun 2003 21:31:58 -0000 Message-ID: <20030629213158.23518.qmail@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:30:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030625 Thunderbird/0.1a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1056910767.21536.46.camel@hasele> In-Reply-To: <1056910767.21536.46.camel@hasele> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 80.197.147.147 Subject: Re: PHP 5.0.0 Beta 1 From: webmaster@tsn.dk (Tom Sommer) Sterling Hughes wrote: > The PHP development community is proud to announce the release of > PHP 5 Beta 1. Both source packages and a Win32 build are available, you > can find these packages at http://www.php.net/downloads.php. Is it a good idea to list it ON TOP of the download page? Newbies will just think "Hey, I want the latest" and click the first link they find... The 5.0 B1 should be below the latest stable release, IMO... The download section should also notify users that this is indeed an UNSTABLE version... My two cents :) -- Tom Sommer, Denmark www.dreamcoder.dk - www.tsn.dk - http://blog.dreamcoder.dk