Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29599 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75766 invoked by uid 1010); 21 May 2007 06:39:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75750 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 06:39:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 May 2007 06:39:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:39056] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FA/7A-05892-E8E31564 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 02:39:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4L6d6hJ032711; Mon, 21 May 2007 08:39:06 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:39:07 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: David cc: "'Stanislav Malyshev'" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <000001c79b71$543e0970$fcba1c50$@com> Message-ID: References: <465022BE.1020905@hardened-php.net> <7d5a202f0705201415s71982fd2jb61b8bffbb7ba6de@mail.gmail.com> <46513546.5000303@zend.com> <7d5a202f0705202303s2ff4d0cdg1157c1e245c3c2e4@mail.gmail.com> <46513745.7030701@zend.com> <000001c79b71$543e0970$fcba1c50$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Dismantling the lies... From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sun, 20 May 2007, David wrote: > The function call does strike me as completely unnecessary and the > additional stack operations required are expensive. I'm willing to be > that if the function was converted to a macro, the proposed solution > would be a workable fix. Just my two cents; I'm not very experienced > with the PHP internals yet. I actually have a patch for that somewhere, let's see if I can find that if I get back to the office. regards, Derick