Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29573 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12010 invoked by uid 1010); 20 May 2007 06:49:42 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11995 invoked from network); 20 May 2007 06:49:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 May 2007 06:49:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.136 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.136 c2bthomr04.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.136] ([213.123.20.136:24680] helo=c2bthomr04.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 90/E0-32102-28FEF464 for ; Sun, 20 May 2007 02:49:40 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.3] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr04.btconnect.com with ESMTP id HCC09987; Sun, 20 May 2007 07:49:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <464FEF85.1020806@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 07:49:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <1082866338.20070516162127@marcus-boerger.de> <464ED249.50104@zend.com> <4e89b4260705190659xee5ccf8x7be8a9b161c3196a@mail.gmail.com> <200705201052.13177.forums@jefferyfernandez.id.au> In-Reply-To: <200705201052.13177.forums@jefferyfernandez.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr04.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090209.464FEF7F.007F,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=10.0.0.3, so=2006-12-09 10:45:40, dmn=5.3.10/2007-02-21 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 Preview From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Jeffery Fernandez wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007 23:59, Wez Furlong wrote: >> On 5/19/07, Antony Dovgal wrote: >>> I just want to clarify this situation - either the maintainers are >>> temporarily busy and will continue working on their extensions or they >>> have to admit that they won't do it anymore, we'll mark the extensions as >>> orphaned and start looking for other maintainers. >> I'm going to say it one last time: there are other maintainers. >> I'm temporarily too busy, but we have other maintainers. >> Please assign bugs to the other maintainers. > > Jee guys, why don't we just have a status for each maintainer. That way if a > maintainer is busy with their personal life/work, their name will not show in > the assign to list and an other maintainer will get picked to be assigned > with the bug report. Wouldn't this avoid all this pointless discussion? I don't see ANY reason bugs should be assigned by anybody other than the person who is ACTUALLY working on it? *IF* someone has time or has found a fix for a problem, THEY assign the bug to them selves and put up the fix. Someone else 'deciding' that so and so is going to fix such and such is simply not practical unless that person is also PAYING to have work done - which is not the case on PHP. Requests for someone to LOOK at a particular bug could be made, but the decision on assignment should only be made by the person DOING the work? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://home.lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk MEDW - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/ Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php