Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29496 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44865 invoked by uid 1010); 17 May 2007 18:28:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44850 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 18:28:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 May 2007 18:28:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andrei@gravitonic.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andrei@gravitonic.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain gravitonic.com from 204.11.219.139 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andrei@gravitonic.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 mail.lerdorf.com Received: from [204.11.219.139] ([204.11.219.139:47366] helo=mail.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B2/F1-10325-FCE9C464 for ; Thu, 17 May 2007 14:28:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.147] (m2c4336d0.tmodns.net [208.54.67.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.lerdorf.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-2) with ESMTP id l4HISPOJ002592; Thu, 17 May 2007 11:28:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1082866338.20070516162127@marcus-boerger.de> <852842D7-B7AB-4BD5-A342-0D5DB0E7ABBC@gravitonic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: <9DA317BF-24B5-4BFE-8B66-FC8F4D755872@gravitonic.com> Cc: "Marcus Boerger" , internals@lists.php.net, "Andi Gutmans" , "Dmitry Stogov" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:28:25 -0500 To: Pierre X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6 Preview From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski) > I replied to all mails I got from you. About IRC, sorry, but EFNet's > php channel are really not anymore my cup of tea and I told you that > already. But I'm reachable by email or on freenode, like always. You did not reply to my emails asking for status on the input decoding part, more than once. >> I would request that you do not try to work on the input decoding >> feature since you proved very unreliable in the past. > > I suggest you to change your way to ask things. > > You first requested me to give the hand, and that's what I did. And > suddenly, only because one lost the interest/time/motivation to do it, > I was again in charge without any kind of discussion or questions.That > surprises me, but I can live with that. But please, stop to tell me > that I'm not reliable, that's insulting and does not reflect the > facts. The facts are these: you signed up to work on the input decoding feature, knowing full well that it is a critical infrastructure piece. You told me that you made some progress but also ran into problems. Over the course of a month or so, I asked multiple times about the status of this project, both on email and on IRC, and did not receive a reply from you most of the time. If you lost interest/ time/motivation to do this, you should have said this outright instead of stringing us along for weeks while you made miscellaneous patches to GD and zip extensions. At the end, all I was asking for was the code you had written so far, and even that you were not willing to share. So yes, I do consider you flaky and unreliable, and that is my (and some of the others' by the way) personal opinion, but don't tell me that this does not reflect the facts. -Andrei